Upgrade.Vet

ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001051505

Original file (2001051505.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: Uncharacterized

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 891016

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 5, AR 635-200

         b. Reason: Did Not Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards-No Disability

4. Prior review(s): NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                           NONE
a. Period entered for: 4 Years
b. Entry date: 890912
c. Age: 20 Years DOB: 690716
d. Educational level: 13 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
         GT: 98 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E1
0 Year(s) 1 Month(s) 5 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other

6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE

         Date     Offense(s)


7. Court-Martial data: NONE

         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)


         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

8.       Remarks: NONE

SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE

Other discharge(s):

         Service From      To        Type Discharge

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

         a. The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 1989, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) board found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. On 6 October 1989, medical approving authority approved the findings of the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD). On 6 October 1989, the applicant was informed of the Entrance Physical Standards Board findings. The applicant concurred with the medical proceedings, and requested to be discharged from the US Army. The unit commander recommended approval. On 11 October 1989, the separation authority approved the applicant’s separation with an uncharacterized discharge.

         b. On 16 October 1989, the applicant was discharged with an uncharacterized discharge under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards. He was credited with 1 month, and 5 days active service on the enlistment under review.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry level status. Army regulation state that a soldier is in an entry level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.

SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS

1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 010109, with two (2) enclosure(s).
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion

Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor

a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):

PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 21 February 2001 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

         ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason

2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

         a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

         b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

(1) The issue is rejected. The proceedings of the Enlistment Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) revealed that the applicant had a medical condition that was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, competent medical authority approved these findings. The applicant agreed with these findings, the proposed action for administrative separation, and requested immediate discharge from the Army. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status (ELS), with the description of service as uncharacterized. A soldier is in entry level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the soldier a probationary period. This is not an adverse separation action and denotes only that the individual had less than l80 days on active duty. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases, which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The Board determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process. Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. The Board being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, the Board voted to deny relief.

3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

         ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                    under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508

3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified


MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

NONE

SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:

WILSON A. SHATZER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:

EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number: 2001051505 INDEX NUMBERS: A9405
Date of Review: 010221 A9221
Character of Service: EL A9445
Date of Discharge: 890116 A0100
Authority: AR 635-200 C5
Reason: A2800
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A

PART IX - VOTING RECORD

Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr     X         X

2.      Mbr     X         X

3.      Mbr     X         X

4.      Mbr     X         X

5.      PO     X         X

Similar Decisions

ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084436

Original file (2003084436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084442

Original file (2003084442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001052823

Original file (2001052823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The evidence of record shows that on 17 August 1994, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) board found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the characterization of service were...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001052472

Original file (2001052472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 001228. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003089330

Original file (AR2003089330.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. This document shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with service uncharacterized. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003083909

Original file (2003083909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024990

Original file (1999024990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to and authenticated by the applicant at his discharge clearly shows his character of service as uncharacterized. The Board, being convinced that the characterization of service and the reason for discharge were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002077397

Original file (2002077397.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry level status. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003086964

Original file (2003086964.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002079360

Original file (2002079360.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

At the time of his release from active duty, the applicant had completed 1 month, and 22 days of active military service in the period under review. After the applicant was informed of the Entrance Physical Standards Board findings recommending relief from active duty, the applicant concurred with the medical proceedings, and requested to be relieved from active duty and discharged from the Reserve of the Army. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001051505

Similar Decisions